Performance measures 2015/16
These are the measures that we will use in the financial year 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 to assess our performance. The information is provided to supplement that in the PCO's Estimates 2015/16 (Vote Parliamentary Counsel).
Performance measures | Budgeted standard |
---|---|
Category: Access to Legislation |
|
This category is intended to achieve that New Zealand Bills, Acts, and Legislative Instruments are readily accessible to the public in a timely manner and in an accurate and authoritative form. Performance in the Access to Legislation category will be assessed as follows: |
|
Free public access to the New Zealand Legislation (NZL) website is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week | 99% |
Drafting tool availability for Office of the Clerk and Inland Revenue Department staff. A 100% budget standard is not appropriate as system outages are required for planned upgrades | 92% |
Public enquiries are responded to within one working day | 90% |
Public enquiries are responded to within five working days | 100% |
Amendments will be incorporated within 15 working days of the date of effect of the amendment | 100% |
The number of Government Bills supplied to the House and published in the calendar year. As this output is demand driven, quantities will vary from year to year | 50–70 |
The number of Supplementary Order Papers (SOPs) supplied to the House and published in the calendar year. As this output is demand driven, quantities will vary from year to year | 70–100 |
The number of Acts of Parliament published in the calendar year. As this output is demand driven, quantities will vary from year to year | 80–120 |
The number of Legislative Instruments published in the calendar year. As this output is demand driven, quantities will vary from year to year | 300–400 |
Legislation is published in printed and electronic forms within the following timeframes:
|
100% |
The Attorney-General is satisfied that the quality standard has been achieved. The quality standard is that:
|
The Attorney-General is satisfied |
Category: Law Drafting Services |
|
This category is intended to provide high quality legislative drafting services and advice in a professional, impartial, and responsive manner in delivering the Government's legislation programme. Performance in the Law Drafting Services category will be assessed as follows: |
|
All Bills on the annual legislative programme in categories 1 and 2 (both of which are Bills that must be passed in the current calendar year) are drafted. As this output is demand driven, quantities will vary from year to year | 100% |
Government Bills drafted and amended in the calendar year. As this output is demand driven, quantities will vary from year to year | 50–70 |
Legislative Instruments drafted in the calendar year. As this output is demand driven, quantities will vary from year to year | 300–400 |
The Attorney-General is satisfied that the following quality and timeliness standards have been achieved. The quality standard is that:
|
The Attorney-General is satisfied |
The proportion of instructing departments and agencies we survey that rate the quality and timeliness standards as four or better on a scale of one to five, with one being very dissatisfied and five being very satisfied. The quality standard is that:
|
90% |
Select committees are satisfied that the quality and timeliness standards have been achieved as determined by survey responses from relevant select committees. The quality standard is that:
The timeliness standard is that:
|
Select committees are satisfied |
Pacific Island instructors are satisfied that the quality and timeliness standards have been achieved as determined by survey responses from relevant Pacific Island instructors. The quality standard is that:
The timeliness standard is that:
|
Pacific Island instructors are satisfied |
Proportion of Bills drafted by the PCO and introduced that are peer reviewed. The quality standard for peer reviewing is that:
|
80% |
Proportion of Legislative Instruments drafted by the PCO and submitted to Cabinet that are peer reviewed. The quality standard for peer reviewing is that:
|
80% |
The performance measures and standards for peer reviewing exclude Bills drafted by the Pacific Island desk and local, private, and Members' Bills, Bills introduced and passed through all stages under urgency that are not referred to select committees (eg Appropriation and Imprest Supply Bills).
|
|
Proportion of all introduced Bills drafted by the PCO that are proofread. The quality standard is that:
|
97% |
Proportion of Legislative Instruments drafted by the PCO that are proofread. The quality standard is that:
|
97% |
The performance measures and standards for proofreading exclude Bills drafted by the Pacific Island desk and all Appropriation and Imprest Supply Bills (these are proofread in full only once before introduction as they comprise a standard template format and the contents of that template are thoroughly checked before introduction). | |
In regards to the three-yearly revision programme, the Attorney-General is satisfied that the following quality and timeliness standards have been achieved. The quality standard is that:
|
The Attorney-General is satisfied |
In regards to the three-yearly revision programme, relevant instructing departments and agencies are satisfied that the following quality and timeliness standards have been achieved. The quality standards for the three-yearly revision programme are that:
|
Instructing departments and agencies are satisfied |